<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNTO411 &#8211; Heading to the Dead Phlog Pool? Are Corporate Blogs Really an Oxymoron?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/</link>
	<description>Exploring New and Social Media in Pharma and Healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:14:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Med 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life After CNTO411 - John Mack Talks to Michael Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Med 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life After CNTO411 - John Mack Talks to Michael Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-587</guid>
		<description>[...] a follow up to my recent blog post on &#8220;CNTO11 - Heading to the Dead Phlog Pool?&#8220;, you might want to listen to an interview on BlogTalkRadio that John Mack (Pharma Makreting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a follow up to my recent blog post on &#8220;CNTO11 &#8211; Heading to the Dead Phlog Pool?&#8220;, you might want to listen to an interview on BlogTalkRadio that John Mack (Pharma Makreting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Med 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life After CNTO411 - John Mack Talks to Michael Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Med 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Life After CNTO411 - John Mack Talks to Michael Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-588</guid>
		<description>[...] a follow up to my recent blog post on &#8220;CNTO11 - Heading to the Dead Phlog Pool?&#8220;, you might want to listen to an interview on BlogTalkRadio that John Mack (Pharma Makreting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a follow up to my recent blog post on &#8220;CNTO11 &#8211; Heading to the Dead Phlog Pool?&#8220;, you might want to listen to an interview on BlogTalkRadio that John Mack (Pharma Makreting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shwen</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>shwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-586</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for your comment, Steve. 
I think the biggest issue at hand is that fact that a lot of &quot;old school&quot; marketing/PR folks treat Social Media as &quot;just another medium&quot; and apply the same rules to it, thinking it is just a technological evolution. What they fail to consider is that it is also a cultural revolution that requires a real commitment and genuine engagement. 

And when it comes to ROI, I think the issue is knowing what to measure (i.e. objectives) rather than trying to measure it against traditional standards... And to your point, &quot;immediate ROI&quot; is not always evident, especially if you are measuring the wrong data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for your comment, Steve.<br />
I think the biggest issue at hand is that fact that a lot of &#8220;old school&#8221; marketing/PR folks treat Social Media as &#8220;just another medium&#8221; and apply the same rules to it, thinking it is just a technological evolution. What they fail to consider is that it is also a cultural revolution that requires a real commitment and genuine engagement. </p>
<p>And when it comes to ROI, I think the issue is knowing what to measure (i.e. objectives) rather than trying to measure it against traditional standards&#8230; And to your point, &#8220;immediate ROI&#8221; is not always evident, especially if you are measuring the wrong data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Shwen:

I think this is one of your best posts EVER.  It really sums up a lot of what you have been saying over the past few years and sometimes banging your head in frustration! Like anything else in life it is all about follow through and commitment to what you are doing and right now that is just not evident in this industry.  If you can&#039;t show immediate ROI then the common thought is that it must not be working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shwen:</p>
<p>I think this is one of your best posts EVER.  It really sums up a lot of what you have been saying over the past few years and sometimes banging your head in frustration! Like anything else in life it is all about follow through and commitment to what you are doing and right now that is just not evident in this industry.  If you can&#8217;t show immediate ROI then the common thought is that it must not be working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shwen</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>shwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Brandon,

Thanks for ur nice nice words. Hopefully, that&#039;s how all corporate initiatives will view social media engagements (not just pharma). It&#039;s important to understand that it&#039;s not just a trendy advertising medium. Otherwise, the corporate blog will really be an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon,</p>
<p>Thanks for ur nice nice words. Hopefully, that&#8217;s how all corporate initiatives will view social media engagements (not just pharma). It&#8217;s important to understand that it&#8217;s not just a trendy advertising medium. Otherwise, the corporate blog will really be an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shwen</title>
		<link>http://www.med20.com/blog/2009/01/cnto411-heading-to-the-dead-phlog-pool-are-corporate-blogs-really-an-oxymoron/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>shwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.med20.com/blog/?p=895#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Scott, Thanks for your comment. 

While I do agree with much of what you said, the issues for pharma go far beyond the fear of negative comments. There&#039;s a whole federal regulatory issue (e.g. adverse event reporting, off-label promotion, etc) that lead to the industry&#039;s conservatism when it comes to open communication, even for the most basic task of &quot;listening&quot;. 

However, I do believe that it would be in the industry&#039;s best interest to find ways of adopting these tools within the legal and regulatory guidelines, in order to restore a healthy relationship with its customers (pardon the pun). Many are trying, but the uptake is slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, Thanks for your comment. </p>
<p>While I do agree with much of what you said, the issues for pharma go far beyond the fear of negative comments. There&#8217;s a whole federal regulatory issue (e.g. adverse event reporting, off-label promotion, etc) that lead to the industry&#8217;s conservatism when it comes to open communication, even for the most basic task of &#8220;listening&#8221;. </p>
<p>However, I do believe that it would be in the industry&#8217;s best interest to find ways of adopting these tools within the legal and regulatory guidelines, in order to restore a healthy relationship with its customers (pardon the pun). Many are trying, but the uptake is slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

